The Office version of the office suite has a simple and convenient interface, the ability to edit PDF files and additional functionality for creating tables and making financial calculations. It makes the creation, editing and sharing of document easy and professional. No matter where you get Microsoft Office though, you will still need to provide the genuine product key to activate the program.
 
 

One moment, please – Step 1: Sign in with the right account

 

Product Keys August 1, at pm. Saurav Kumar April 7, at am. Kristine Valledor April 7, at am. Amelia D April 7, at am. Ashley April 7, at am. Ashley Nicole April 7, at am. Paula McQuillar April 7, at am. Manish kaim April 18, at pm. Manish kaim April 26, at am. Hina May 5, at pm.

George May 19, at am. Yasir May 21, at am. Basha June 5, at am. Reece Cunningham June 28, at am. June 15, at am. Tone Baldwin June 20, at pm. Thalia July 7, at am. Dwayne July 7, at am. Toya July 7, at pm. Latanya July 7, at pm. Joe Dredd July 14, at pm.

Clemente July 14, at pm. Roberto July 14, at pm. Ezequiel July 14, at pm. Berenice July 14, at pm. Lisandra July 14, at pm. Noble July 14, at pm. Bradley July 14, at pm. Jenelle July 14, at pm. Milford July 14, at pm. Amanda July 14, at pm. Rudolph July 14, at pm. Ellie July 14, at pm. Alva July 14, at pm. Gayle July 14, at pm. Somer July 14, at pm. Alan July 14, at pm. Mathilda July 16, at am. Maxi July 20, at pm. Aliza July 27, at am. Navkar Trendz August 1, at am.

Amit Yadav August 2, at am. Puneet August 6, at am. Kulwinder Singh August 10, at pm. Kulwinder Singh August 15, at am. D Suresh August 17, at pm.

Eduard August 18, at pm. Miki August 20, at pm. Robin September 16, at pm. Bridgett September 28, at am. Chief September 29, at pm. The Office version It is the successor to the Office version and the version that precedes the Office version. Support for this version ended in April Office brought with it some improvements compared to its previous version As main features we can highlight an update in the user interface, a new support for the extended file format and introduced support for new devices on the market.

Also, this version of Office started add features that have been important in your new updates , as is the support for services such as OneDrive, Skype and Outlook itself, which are currently part of Office The activation of the Office suite using a product key It can be considered as the safest method of all the available methods, this because we are using a generic code for activation and it is very similar to using a purchased license.

Nowadays it is not possible to purchase Office licenses from the official store Since this version is not the most recent and Windows always gives priority to its most current version, therefore there are not many official methods. Next we will offer you a list of activation codes. You will only have to select a product key among all the available codes, try until you find one that is effective.

If you haven’t got one product key to activate Microsoft Office you can try the alternative methods. However, we caution that using one of these methods to Activate Office can be dangerous. Now enter your version of Microsoft office Product Key in the space provided in the prompt window. Make sure you have a good internet connection then it will take only a minute to make your copy of MS Office activated. KMSpico is the fastest, safest and easiest way to activate Windows 8.

KMSpico easily activates the entire new line of Microsoft products: Windows and Office, including all applications: Visio, Project, etc. Please, note that Microsoft does not recommend using activators such as KMSpico. Corporation insists on buying the original key, which costs a lot of money. One of the most important factors to remember about Microsoft Office is that it is reliable. It is easy to use, making document creation a breeze. The only problem that most MS Office users may encounter is the lack of activation keys to be found online.

This often means that while you may be able to download the program, you will not likely to be able to use it.

 

Free Office Product Keys |

 

Open-source software OSS is computer software that is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code to anyone and for any purpose. Open-source software is a prominent example of open collaboration , meaning any capable user is able to participate online in development, making the number of possible contributors indefinite.

The ability to examine the code facilitates public trust in the software. Open-source software development can bring in diverse perspectives beyond those of a single company. Open source code can be used for studying and allows capable end users to adapt software to their personal needs in a similar way user scripts and custom style sheets allow for web sites, and eventually publish the modification as a fork for users with similar preferences, and directly submit possible improvements as pull requests.

In the early days of computing, programmers and developers shared software in order to learn from each other and evolve the field of computing. For example, Unix included the operating system source code for users.

Eventually, the open-source notion moved to the wayside of commercialization of software in the years — However, academics still often developed software collaboratively. The paper received significant attention in early , and was one factor in motivating Netscape Communications Corporation to release their popular Netscape Communicator Internet suite as free software. Netscape’s act prompted Raymond and others to look into how to bring the Free Software Foundation ‘s free software ideas and perceived benefits to the commercial software industry.

They concluded that FSF’s social activism was not appealing to companies like Netscape, and looked for a way to rebrand the free software movement to emphasize the business potential of sharing and collaborating on software source code.

The Open Source Initiative was founded in February to encourage use of the new term and evangelize open-source principles. While the Open Source Initiative sought to encourage the use of the new term and evangelize the principles it adhered to, commercial software vendors found themselves increasingly threatened by the concept of freely distributed software and universal access to an application’s source code.

Microsoft executive Jim Allchin publicly stated in that “open source is an intellectual property destroyer. I can’t imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business. IBM, Oracle, Google, and State Farm are just a few of the companies with a serious public stake in today’s competitive open-source market.

There has been a significant shift in the corporate philosophy concerning the development of FOSS. The free-software movement was launched in In , a group of individuals advocated that the term free software should be replaced by open-source software OSS as an expression which is less ambiguous [12] [13] [14] and more comfortable for the corporate world. With open-source software, generally, anyone is allowed to create modifications of it, port it to new operating systems and instruction set architectures , share it with others or, in some cases, market it.

Scholars Casson and Ryan have pointed out several policy-based reasons for adoption of open source — in particular, the heightened value proposition from open source when compared to most proprietary formats in the following categories:. The Open Source Definition presents an open-source philosophy and further defines the terms of use, modification and redistribution of open-source software. Software licenses grant rights to users which would otherwise be reserved by copyright law to the copyright holder.

Several open-source software licenses have qualified within the boundaries of the Open Source Definition. The most prominent and popular example is the GNU General Public License GPL , which “allows free distribution under the condition that further developments and applications are put under the same licence”, thus also free.

The open source label came out of a strategy session held on April 7, , in Palo Alto in reaction to Netscape’s January announcement of a source code release for Navigator as Mozilla.

Many people claimed that the birth of the Internet , since , started the open-source movement, while others do not distinguish between open-source and free software movements. The Free Software Foundation FSF , started in , intended the word “free” to mean freedom to distribute or “free as in free speech” and not freedom from cost or “free as in free beer”. Since a great deal of free software already was and still is free of charge, such free software became associated with zero cost, which seemed anti-commercial.

With at least 20 years of evidence from case histories of closed software development versus open development already provided by the Internet developer community, the OSI presented the “open source” case to commercial businesses, like Netscape.

The OSI hoped that the use of the label “open source”, a term suggested by Christine Peterson [7] [20] of the Foresight Institute at the strategy session, would eliminate ambiguity, particularly for individuals who perceive “free software” as anti-commercial.

They sought to bring a higher profile to the practical benefits of freely available source code, and they wanted to bring major software businesses and other high-tech industries into open source. Perens attempted to register “open source” as a service mark for the OSI, but that attempt was impractical by trademark standards. Meanwhile, due to the presentation of Raymond’s paper to the upper management at Netscape—Raymond only discovered when he read the press release , [21] and was called by Netscape CEO Jim Barksdale ‘s PA later in the day—Netscape released its Navigator source code as open source, with favorable results.

The Open Source Initiative ‘s OSI definition is recognized by several governments internationally [23] as the standard or de facto definition. The definition was based on the Debian Free Software Guidelines , written and adapted primarily by Perens. Under Perens’ definition, open source is a broad software license that makes source code available to the general public with relaxed or non-existent restrictions on the use and modification of the code.

It is an explicit “feature” of open source that it puts very few restrictions on the use or distribution by any organization or user, in order to enable the rapid evolution of the software. Despite initially accepting it, [31] Richard Stallman of the FSF now flatly opposes the term “Open Source” being applied to what they refer to as “free software”. Although he agrees that the two terms describe “almost the same category of software”, Stallman considers equating the terms incorrect and misleading.

When an author contributes code to an open-source project e. Some open-source projects do not take contributed code under a license, but actually require joint assignment of the author’s copyright in order to accept code contributions into the project.

The proliferation of open-source licenses is a negative aspect of the open-source movement because it is often difficult to understand the legal implications of the differences between licenses. With more than , open-source projects available and more than unique licenses, the complexity of deciding how to manage open-source use within “closed-source” commercial enterprises has dramatically increased.

In view of this, open-source practitioners are starting to use classification schemes in which FOSS licenses are grouped typically based on the existence and obligations imposed by the copyleft provision; the strength of the copyleft provision.

As a result, if end-users violate the licensing conditions, their license disappears, meaning they are infringing copyright. Certification can help to build user confidence.

Certification could be applied to the simplest component, to a whole software system. This project aims to build a desktop interface that every end-user is able to understand and interact with, thus crossing the language and cultural barriers.

The project would improve developing nations’ access to information systems. Raymond suggests a model for developing OSS known as the bazaar model. Raymond likens the development of software by traditional methodologies to building a cathedral, “carefully crafted by individual wizards or small bands of mages working in splendid isolation”. In the traditional model of development, which he called the cathedral model, development takes place in a centralized way.

Roles are clearly defined. Roles include people dedicated to designing the architects , people responsible for managing the project, and people responsible for implementation. Traditional software engineering follows the cathedral model.

The bazaar model, however, is different. In this model, roles are not clearly defined. Gregorio Robles [42] suggests that software developed using the bazaar model should exhibit the following patterns:. Data suggests, however, that OSS is not quite as democratic as the bazaar model suggests. The average number of authors involved in a project was 5.

Open-source software is usually easier to obtain than proprietary software, often resulting in increased use. Additionally, the availability of an open-source implementation of a standard can increase adoption of that standard.

Moreover, lower costs of marketing and logistical services are needed for OSS. It is a good tool to promote a company’s image, including its commercial products. Open-source development offers the potential to quicken innovation and the creation of innovation and social value. In France for instance, a policy that incentivized government to favor free open-source software increased to nearly , OSS contributions per year, generating social value by increasing the quantity and quality of open-source software.

It is said to be more reliable since it typically has thousands of independent programmers testing and fixing bugs of the software. Open source is not dependent on the company or author that originally created it.

Even if the company fails, the code continues to exist and be developed by its users. Also, it uses open standards accessible to everyone; thus, it does not have the problem of incompatible formats that may exist in proprietary software. It is flexible because modular systems allow programmers to build custom interfaces, or add new abilities to it and it is innovative since open-source programs are the product of collaboration among a large number of different programmers.

The mix of divergent perspectives, corporate objectives, and personal goals speeds up innovation. Moreover, free software can be developed in accordance with purely technical requirements.

It does not require thinking about commercial pressure that often degrades the quality of the software. Commercial pressures make traditional software developers pay more attention to customers’ requirements than to security requirements, since such features are somewhat invisible to the customer.

It is sometimes said that the open-source development process may not be well defined and the stages in the development process, such as system testing and documentation may be ignored. However this is only true for small mostly single programmer projects. Larger, successful projects do define and enforce at least some rules as they need them to make the teamwork possible. Consequently, only technical requirements may be satisfied and not the ones of the market.

It depends on control mechanisms in order to create effective performance of autonomous agents who participate in virtual organizations. In OSS development, tools are used to support the development of the product and the development process itself. Revision control systems such as Concurrent Versions System CVS and later Subversion SVN and Git are examples of tools, often themselves open source, help manage the source code files and the changes to those files for a software project.

Open-source projects are often loosely organized with “little formalised process modelling or support”, but utilities such as issue trackers are often used to organize open-source software development. Tools such as mailing lists and IRC provide means of coordination among developers. New organizations tend to have a more sophisticated governance model and their membership is often formed by legal entity members.

Open Source Software Institute is a membership-based, non-profit c 6 organization established in that promotes the development and implementation of open source software solutions within US Federal, state and local government agencies.

OSSI’s efforts have focused on promoting adoption of open-source software programs and policies within Federal Government and Defense and Homeland Security communities. Open Source for America is a group created to raise awareness in the United States Federal Government about the benefits of open-source software.

Their stated goals are to encourage the government’s use of open source software, participation in open-source software projects, and incorporation of open-source community dynamics to increase government transparency. Companies whose business centers on the development of open-source software employ a variety of business models to solve the challenge of how to make money providing software that is by definition licensed free of charge.

Each of these business strategies rests on the premise that users of open-source technologies are willing to purchase additional software features under proprietary licenses, or purchase other services or elements of value that complement the open-source software that is core to the business. This additional value can be, but not limited to, enterprise-grade features and up-time guarantees often via a service-level agreement to satisfy business or compliance requirements, performance and efficiency gains by features not yet available in the open source version, legal protection e.

The debate over open source vs. The top four reasons as provided by Open Source Business Conference survey [64] individuals or organizations choose open-source software are:.

Since innovative companies no longer rely heavily on software sales, proprietary software has become less of a necessity. Further, companies like Novell who traditionally sold software the old-fashioned way continually debate the benefits of switching to open-source availability, having already switched part of the product offering to open source code.

With this market shift, more critical systems are beginning to rely on open-source offerings, [69] allowing greater funding such as US Department of Homeland Security grants [69] to help “hunt for security bugs.

 
 

Microsoft office standard 2013 activation code free

 
 

Microsoft Office XP received mixed to positive reviews after its release. CNET praised the new collaboration and data recovery features, and stated that Office XP offered a “host of incremental improvements” over its predecessor, Office , but ultimately concluded that “most enhancements and additions are better suited for groups than individuals. While most assessments of Office XP were positive, the speech recognition feature was frequently criticized due to its inaccuracy and lack of advanced functionality.

CNET regarded it as “especially lame” because of its inability to recognize text editing commands such as “select the sentence” and because it required users to manually switch between command and dictation modes. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Version of Microsoft Office suite. These applications make up the Standard edition. Windows NT 4. List of languages. Main article: Smart tag Microsoft. Intel Pentium III. Hardware accelerated video card or MMX processor.

An audio output device and microphone are required for speech recognition. Collaboration features require Office 97 or later Internet access is required for product activation and online functionality.

Touchscreen for handwriting functionality. News Center. May 31, Retrieved February 25, Download Center. March 30, Archived from the original on January 5, Office Support.

May 30, Archived from the original on December 1, Archived from the original on March 7, Retrieved April 9, August 6, Archived from the original on April 14, Retrieved February 26, Windows IT Pro. Archived from the original on June 13, Retrieved January 3, March 5, Retrieved September 5, Archived from the original on January 3, CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on February 25, Retrieved January 1, Retrieved July 25, Keynote Support.

Retrieved January 23, September Archived from the original DOC on November 4, May 13, March 11, Net strategy”. And happy new year to you! December 27, Archived from the original on August 21, NET technologies at financial meeting”.

Supersite for Windows. Archived from the original on March 30, Retrieved December 28, Archived from the original on April 6, Archived from the original on March 2, Archived from the original on June 1, FREE Delivery. Only 7 left in stock. Get it Thursday, Aug 11 – Friday, Aug Currently unavailable. Get it Friday, Aug 12 – Saturday, Aug Free Download. Available for download now.

Get it Thursday, Aug Activation Code in Box. Only 14 left in stock. Activation Code by email. Limited time deal. Despite initially accepting it, [31] Richard Stallman of the FSF now flatly opposes the term “Open Source” being applied to what they refer to as “free software”.

Although he agrees that the two terms describe “almost the same category of software”, Stallman considers equating the terms incorrect and misleading. When an author contributes code to an open-source project e. Some open-source projects do not take contributed code under a license, but actually require joint assignment of the author’s copyright in order to accept code contributions into the project.

The proliferation of open-source licenses is a negative aspect of the open-source movement because it is often difficult to understand the legal implications of the differences between licenses. With more than , open-source projects available and more than unique licenses, the complexity of deciding how to manage open-source use within “closed-source” commercial enterprises has dramatically increased.

In view of this, open-source practitioners are starting to use classification schemes in which FOSS licenses are grouped typically based on the existence and obligations imposed by the copyleft provision; the strength of the copyleft provision. As a result, if end-users violate the licensing conditions, their license disappears, meaning they are infringing copyright.

Certification can help to build user confidence. Certification could be applied to the simplest component, to a whole software system. This project aims to build a desktop interface that every end-user is able to understand and interact with, thus crossing the language and cultural barriers.

The project would improve developing nations’ access to information systems. Raymond suggests a model for developing OSS known as the bazaar model. Raymond likens the development of software by traditional methodologies to building a cathedral, “carefully crafted by individual wizards or small bands of mages working in splendid isolation”. In the traditional model of development, which he called the cathedral model, development takes place in a centralized way.

Roles are clearly defined. Roles include people dedicated to designing the architects , people responsible for managing the project, and people responsible for implementation. Traditional software engineering follows the cathedral model.

The bazaar model, however, is different. In this model, roles are not clearly defined. Gregorio Robles [42] suggests that software developed using the bazaar model should exhibit the following patterns:.

Data suggests, however, that OSS is not quite as democratic as the bazaar model suggests. The average number of authors involved in a project was 5.

Open-source software is usually easier to obtain than proprietary software, often resulting in increased use.

Additionally, the availability of an open-source implementation of a standard can increase adoption of that standard. Moreover, lower costs of marketing and logistical services are needed for OSS.

It is a good tool to promote a company’s image, including its commercial products. Open-source development offers the potential to quicken innovation and the creation of innovation and social value. In France for instance, a policy that incentivized government to favor free open-source software increased to nearly , OSS contributions per year, generating social value by increasing the quantity and quality of open-source software. It is said to be more reliable since it typically has thousands of independent programmers testing and fixing bugs of the software.

Open source is not dependent on the company or author that originally created it. Even if the company fails, the code continues to exist and be developed by its users. Also, it uses open standards accessible to everyone; thus, it does not have the problem of incompatible formats that may exist in proprietary software. It is flexible because modular systems allow programmers to build custom interfaces, or add new abilities to it and it is innovative since open-source programs are the product of collaboration among a large number of different programmers.

The mix of divergent perspectives, corporate objectives, and personal goals speeds up innovation. Moreover, free software can be developed in accordance with purely technical requirements. It does not require thinking about commercial pressure that often degrades the quality of the software.

Commercial pressures make traditional software developers pay more attention to customers’ requirements than to security requirements, since such features are somewhat invisible to the customer. It is sometimes said that the open-source development process may not be well defined and the stages in the development process, such as system testing and documentation may be ignored.

However this is only true for small mostly single programmer projects. Larger, successful projects do define and enforce at least some rules as they need them to make the teamwork possible. Consequently, only technical requirements may be satisfied and not the ones of the market. It depends on control mechanisms in order to create effective performance of autonomous agents who participate in virtual organizations.

In OSS development, tools are used to support the development of the product and the development process itself. Revision control systems such as Concurrent Versions System CVS and later Subversion SVN and Git are examples of tools, often themselves open source, help manage the source code files and the changes to those files for a software project.

Open-source projects are often loosely organized with “little formalised process modelling or support”, but utilities such as issue trackers are often used to organize open-source software development. Tools such as mailing lists and IRC provide means of coordination among developers.

New organizations tend to have a more sophisticated governance model and their membership is often formed by legal entity members. Open Source Software Institute is a membership-based, non-profit c 6 organization established in that promotes the development and implementation of open source software solutions within US Federal, state and local government agencies. OSSI’s efforts have focused on promoting adoption of open-source software programs and policies within Federal Government and Defense and Homeland Security communities.

Open Source for America is a group created to raise awareness in the United States Federal Government about the benefits of open-source software. Their stated goals are to encourage the government’s use of open source software, participation in open-source software projects, and incorporation of open-source community dynamics to increase government transparency.

Companies whose business centers on the development of open-source software employ a variety of business models to solve the challenge of how to make money providing software that is by definition licensed free of charge.

Each of these business strategies rests on the premise that users of open-source technologies are willing to purchase additional software features under proprietary licenses, or purchase other services or elements of value that complement the open-source software that is core to the business. This additional value can be, but not limited to, enterprise-grade features and up-time guarantees often via a service-level agreement to satisfy business or compliance requirements, performance and efficiency gains by features not yet available in the open source version, legal protection e.

The debate over open source vs. The top four reasons as provided by Open Source Business Conference survey [64] individuals or organizations choose open-source software are:.

Since innovative companies no longer rely heavily on software sales, proprietary software has become less of a necessity. Further, companies like Novell who traditionally sold software the old-fashioned way continually debate the benefits of switching to open-source availability, having already switched part of the product offering to open source code. With this market shift, more critical systems are beginning to rely on open-source offerings, [69] allowing greater funding such as US Department of Homeland Security grants [69] to help “hunt for security bugs.

Proprietary source distributors have started to develop and contribute to the open-source community due to the market share shift, doing so by the need to reinvent their models in order to remain competitive.

Many advocates argue that open-source software is inherently safer because any person can view, edit, and change code. According to the Free software movement ‘s leader, Richard Stallman , the main difference is that by choosing one term over the other i. The FSF [74] said that the term “open source” fosters an ambiguity of a different kind such that it confuses the mere availability of the source with the freedom to use, modify, and redistribute it. On the other hand, the “free software” term was criticized for the ambiguity of the word “free” as “available at no cost”, which was seen as discouraging for business adoption, [75] and for the historical ambiguous usage of the term.

Raymond and others. The term “open source” was originally intended to be trademarkable; however, the term was deemed too descriptive, so no trademark exists. OSI Certified is a trademark licensed only to people who are distributing software licensed under a license listed on the Open Source Initiative’s list. Although the OSI definition of “open-source software” is widely accepted, a small number of people and organizations use the term to refer to software where the source is available for viewing, but which may not legally be modified or redistributed.

Such software is more often referred to as source-available , or as shared source , a term coined by Microsoft in Before changing the license of software, distributors usually audit the source code for third party licensed code which they would have to remove or obtain permission for its relicense.

Backdoors and other malware should also be removed as they may easily be discovered after release of the code. So if we needed to patch, adjust, or adapt, we could. Archived from the original on February 15, Retrieved February 25, Google Play. Archived from the original on March 24, Retrieved April 10, Archived from the original on March 9, Archived from the original on February 20, App Store.

Archived from the original on August 30, Retrieved August 29, Core editing is free for consumers on devices with screen sizes smaller than PC World. Archived from the original on February 10, Retrieved April 18, March 5, Archived from the original on September 27, Retrieved September 26, August 19, Retrieved March 21, May 21, Archived from the original on May 1, Retrieved October 30, CNET News.

CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on August 15, Retrieved August 28, Archived from the original on March 11, Retrieved June 8, Microsoft team.

February 19, Archived from the original on March 20, ReadWrite Enterprise. SAY Media. Archived from the original on 11 June Retrieved 21 January Office IT Pro Blog. Archived from the original on 25 February Retrieved 20 February Office Support. Retrieved November 1, Archived from the original on February 8, Retrieved February 7, Archived from the original on October 31, Retrieved October 31, Office Web Apps blog. Archived from the original on 9 July Retrieved 4 July Archived from the original on 10 November Retrieved 10 November Office What’s free, what’s not, and what you really need”.

Archived from the original on July 24, Retrieved July 16, Archived from the original on August 4, Archived from the original on August 26, Retrieved August 24, Inside Windows Live. Archived from the original on August 18, Archived from the original on 1 June Outlook Web App. Archived from the original on January 25, Retrieved January 21, Microsoft Office website. Archived from the original on January 18, Project Server Help. Archived from the original on January 10, Archived from the original on January 2, Retrieved March 3, Chrome Web Store.

Microsoft Edge Addons. Archived from the original on April 1, Retrieved January 17, Pro Excel VBA. Berkeley, California: Apress. ISBN MSDN Library.

Archived from the original on January 19, Retrieved February 2, Free Software Foundation. Archived from the original on December 3, And some workarounds “.

Joel on Software. Archived from the original on October 14, Retrieved April 21, Brian Jones: Office Solutions. Archived from the original on April 27, Archived from the original on October 23, February 1, Archived from the original on October 10, Download Center. January 6, Archived from the original on April 29, Retrieved April 17, The Register. July 8, Business Insider. Retrieved April 24, Archived from the original on April 21, Archived from the original on May 18, Archived from the original on May 31, February 26, Archived from the original on May 10, January 24, Archived from the original on March 1, January 29, Archived from the original on November 19, NET Framework”.

April 5, Archived from the original on October 24, Microsoft Office Support. Retrieved February 6, Retrieved March 9, March 9, Archived from the original on April 24, Archived from the original on March 17, August 7, Archived from the original on October 7, Retrieved May 25, Archived from the original on October 29, Retrieved October 26, Retrieved November 26, Archived from the original on August 3, Network World.

Retrieved March 15, June 27, Retrieved June 18, Ars Technica. Archived from the original on March 28, Archived from the original on January 14, February 6, Archived from the original on February 6, September 26, Archived from the original on June 18, July 21, Archived from the original on February 1, Office Blogs.

January 31, Archived from the original on September 5, Retrieved July 25, May 31, Archived from the original on October 30, Retrieved October 8, Archived from the original on April 19, February 15, Archived from the original on February 18, Archived from the original on December 29, Mac Mojo.

Archived from the original on December 11, Retrieved December 19, Archived from the original on September 16, Retrieved September 10, Archived from the original on February 16, Retrieved March 26, Archived PDF from the original on June 23, Retrieved June 24, Archived from the original on June 24, Archived from the original on November 28, Retrieved November 28, November 7,